Narges Achikzei, who was set on fire, and her boyfriend had a heated conflict with the woman's 32-year-old former employer in Utrecht. The family is associated with fraudulent practices. In any case, they were accused by an aggrieved man. He himself was summoned to a court one week after the fire murder in connection with the slander. For a long time he is said to have sent e-mails to the woman - an ex-worker - and damaged her honour and good name.
It is very likely that this conflict played a role in the cruel death. The public prosecutor's office never wants to answer questions about the content of the legal conflict. It is clear that the conflict exerted great pressure on Achikzei and other participants.
O F F I C I A L – R E P O R T
Address ZEIST, LAAN VAN VOLLENHOVE 2175
Further definition of public road/location
Date of commitment/time between Thursday, December 18, 2008 00:00 hrs. and October 17, 2009 00:00 hrs.
Declarant/disadvantaged MEHRABAN, ZAMAN
Date/place April 4, 1979 at KABUL.
Address/Place LAAN VAN VOLLENHOVE 2175 at ZEIST
Postal code/telephone code/telephone 3706 GW 0641371511
My honour and good name were attacked by the accused because the accused accused me of committing criminal offences. The accused had the apparent aim to make this public. This appeared to me from the following.Under case number 08-365181 my girlfriend, named Narges Achikzei, has already reported libel or defamation against the defendant mentioned in this report. This declaration is already under court and the court hearing will take place in the near future. My girlfriend also mentions in this report as the injured party.
I can tell you that in anticipation of the mentioned hearing the defendant is still guilty of defamation or libel. So once again I feel disadvantaged by the accused and damaged in my honour and good name.
The suspect has made it known on several internet sites that both I and my girlfriend are involved in fraudulent practices. The suspect also sends me e-mails in which me and my girlfriend are accused of fraud and threats made to his address. Some of these mails I hereby make available to you.
I know that the website www.loedertje.nl is used by the suspect to attack my name and good honour. The suspect states on this site that my girlfriend and I are involved in fraudulent practices and that we would make false declarations. Also on this site the name details of me and my girlfriend are published. Also, the suspect mentioned my girlfriend’s account number.my girlfriend are engaged in fraudulent practices. The defendant also sends me e-mails in which me and my girlfriend are accused of fraud and threats made to his address. Some of these mails I hereby make available to you.
I know that the website www.loedertje.nl is used by the suspect to attack my name and good honour. The suspect states on this site that my girlfriend and I are involved in fraudulent practices and that we would make false declarations. Also on this site the name details of me and my girlfriend are published. Also, the suspect has the account number of my girlfriend on it.
At the very bottom of the site Loedertje.nl the suspect has placed several “links”. These links refer to various documents drawn up and published by the defendant. In all these documents my girlfriend and I are accused of criminal offences by the defendant, while this is not the case. A printout of the website Loedertje.nl is hereby made available to you.
On the site www.opgelichtopinternet.nl, internetmisleiding.nl and www.expiratieweb.nl the defendant has also published misleading and accusatory stories about me and my girlfriend. By the defendant on several sites information about me and my girlfriend has been published. I can tell you that when you googeled my or my girlfriend’s name, several negative and incorrect messages are shown.
I can tell you that defamation and libel begin to take on serious and threatening forms. For example, I was allowed to receive a forwarded message from the defendant stating that a person who poses as Richard Dekker is eager to interfere in the defendant’s “case”. This person states that he would like to be informed of our family structure and that he would like to know the weaknesses in our family, as well as to receive photos. I am therefore afraid that unknown to me or my family will do something to them.
Because my name on various sites is associated with negative messages, I experience nuisance, or may experience nuisance in the future with, among other things, job applications. I therefore want the suspect to delete these messages or have them removed so that my name is cleaned.
I want to be informed about the progress and the settlement of the criminal case.
After reading and perseverance I signed with a verbalizer.
(declarant/injured party) (verbalizer)
Missing goods irrelevant
Damage amount 0,00 EUR
Date/time declaration Saturday 17 October 2009 14:09 hrs.
Verbalizer BOLT, ARNAUD FERDINAND of the Utrecht police, district of Binnensticht.
Articles(s) 261 paragraph 1 Penal Code
261 paragraph 2 Penal Code
The suspect spread various untrue stories about the declarant via the Internet, apparently with the aim of damaging the declarant’s name and good honour.
Signals see the statement of the person concerned.
Sluiting Drawn up at ZEIST on 17 October 2009 by
BOLT, ARNAUD FERDINAND, on promise