Narges Achikzei, who was set on fire, and her boyfriend had a heated conflict with the woman's 32-year-old former employer in Utrecht. The family is associated with fraudulent practices. In any case, they were accused by an aggrieved man. He himself was summoned to a court one week after the fire murder in connection with the slander. For a long time he is said to have sent e-mails to the woman - an ex-worker - and damaged her honour and good name.
It is very likely that this conflict played a role in the cruel death. The public prosecutor's office never wants to answer questions about the content of the legal conflict. It is clear that the conflict exerted great pressure on Achikzei and other participants.
judgment
COURT OF UTRECHT
Sector canton
Location Utrecht
Case number: 581426 UC EXPL 08-9098
judgment rendered in absentia on 9 July 2008
in terms of
Narges Achikzei
living at Zeist
additive no. 4 GW4533
authorised RBN Lawyers
the plaintiff,
against:
Advios Assurantiën B.V.
established Chilidreef 11
3563 HD Utrecht
defendant’s party
Recitals of the subdistrict court
The plaintiff has brought an action.
The defendant did not reply (on time) and did not request a postponement, so that a default was granted against the defendant.
Since the claim does not appear to the Subdistrict Court to be unlawful or unfounded, it will be allowed in default of appearance.
Condemns the defendant to pay the claimant against proof of discharge:
1. € 1,700.00 gross in respect of the salary for the month of May 2008;
2. € 1,632.00 gross in respect of unpaid holiday pay;
3. € 567.00 gross in respect of unpaid holidays;
4. the statutory increase in accordance with Section 7:625 of the Netherlands Civil Code of 50% over the amount referred to under 1. to 3. above.
amounts allocated;
5. the statutory interest on the allotted amount under 1. to 4. above, from 1 June 2008 until the day of fulfilment;
Case number: 581426 UC EXPL 08-9098 sheet 2
Decision
The cantonal judge:
orders the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings on the part of the plaintiff, until the ruling of this judgment estimated at € 461.44, which includes € 175.00 to the defendant, who has been ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings. salary of the authorised representative, to be paid to the Registrar of the District Court of Utrecht;
declares this judgment enforceable as a stock;
rejects the more or otherwise claimed.
This judgment was rendered by S.M. van Lieshout, subdistrict court judge, and is in the presence of the Registrar pronounced in public on 9 July 2008.

Latest posts
-
Femicide in Eslamshahr, Iran: 18-year-old Fatemeh Soltani murdered by her father
-
Attempted honor killing in Kiel, Germany: Father and two sons charged
-
Honor Killing in Eslamabad-e Gharb, Iran: 12-Year-Old Aylar Zaherpour Murdered by Her Father
-
Honor Killing in Sindhanur, India: Three Sentenced to Death, Nine to Life Imprisonment
-
Honor Killing in Lessebo, Sweden: Father and Brother Convicted of Murdering Shahida Azizi
-
Honor Killing in Uttar Pradesh, India: Young Woman Murdered by Her Father and Brother
-
Man Arrested for Setting Wife on Fire in German Tram
-
Attempted Murder in Duisburg: Mother Holds Woman by Her Hair While Son Stabs Her
-
Honor killing in Kermanshah, Iran: Young woman murdered by her father
-
Honor Killing in Tirana, Albania: Palestinian Father Suspected of Rape and Murder of Daughter